GDIN
2000 Report
Report
on GDIN2000, April 26-29, 2000, Ankara Turkey
See also
Official
Turkish Government Web Site on GDIN.
Report
of the GDIN Secretariat
Success
in Ankara, thanks to great organization from the Turkish
Government:
At a Meeting at METU (Middle East Technical University),
in Ankara Turkey, April 28, 2000, 212 representatives from
32 nations attended. Also attending were: 29 experts from
academia, 40 from industry, 13 from the NGO community, 18
from the UN system, OECD, the World Bank, the EC and the
NATO Science Committee.(1) These representatives adopted
the Ankara Declaration on a Global Disaster Information
Network (GDIN) and elected various individuals and organizations
to posts. It was agreed that GDIN is an informal International
Partnership to facilitate the flow of information in the
right format, at the right time to disaster managers at
any stage of a disaster.
The
Ankara Declaration:
The Ankara Declaration covers
principles and organizational arrangements. For questions,
contact Dr. Albert Simard, Natural Resources, Canada. (alsimard@NRCan.gc.ca),
who acted as lead of the Drafting Committee.
This is an informal document that does not obligate governments
or participating organizations; but it does provide a foundation
upon which to build the future of the GDIN partnership.
In particular it sets the stage for the development of Regional
Disaster Information Networks and standards and procedures
for sharing information. In addition, it offers a flexible
procedure for amending the Declaration at and between conferences.
Dr.
Albert Simard of Natural Resources, Canada, has been leading
the project's efforts on policy statements since 1997, when
he drafted the first such document. In addition to the Ankara
Declaration, Dr. Simard was asked, as chairman of the Policy
Committee and Drafting Committee, to draft a strategy document for consideration
in Australia in 2001. Such a document would examine the
future of GDIN, and would likely take into account suggestions
from the participants on any needed structural changes,
services, membership, etc. GDIN participants should send
their comments on proposed changes (with rationale) to Dr.
Simard.
Elections:
The Ankara Declaration also identifies responsibilities
and organizational relationships of various GDIN positions.
Key positions were also filled; though the selections will
be reviewed at the next GDIN conference in Australia in
March, 2001. Those wishing to compete for these positions
in 2001 should contact the Executive Director: Larry Roeder,
at executivedirector@gdin.org
Positions
filled were:
1.
Larry Roeder, a the Policy Advisor on Disaster Management
at the US Department of State. was elected
Executive Director of GDIN. This appointment coordinates
the other positions. Email: secretariat@gdin.org
2.
Karen Robbins, President of a non-profit entity known as
AmTech, was elected GDIN Fund Director and AmTech, was elected
as the Secretariat. Email is: krobbins@amtech-usa.org.
3.
Alta Haggarty of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs (OCHA) was elected to coordinate a new Working Group
that will develop the Information Facilitator function,
a key GDIN function over the next year, though GDIN would
still work to facilitate information flow during the 2000-2001
timeframe. Email is: haggarty@un.org.
4.
AmTech was also elected to manage the web. The site administrator
is Chris Gianuario. Email is: cgianuario@amtech-usa.org.
This was changed to the GDIN Secretariat in 2006 at
secretariat@gdin.org
5.
The Chairmen of the various Working Groups were also confirmed.
(see below)
A
GDIN FUND (gdinfund@gdin.org)
was also established in order to pay for GDIN
services, which have been either pro-bono or subsidized
up to now. The core budget is projected at one and a half
million US dollars for the first year, though this may be
adjusted. Participants in GDIN are not required to contribute
to the fund; but for those who do, a minimum 5% cash or
in-kind contribution to the core budget enables the donor
to sit on the Board of Directors of the Funding Committee.
Contributions to off-budget items such as pilot projects
do not count. The US Government is currently providing in-kind
support at around 10%. Details on how to make a contribution
will be posted on this web site during the Summer. All details
on the fund, which is to be managed as a Trust, will also
be posted on the web site, for reasons of transparency.
Although a fund was established, the conference also agreed
that GDIN should not be seen as a "donor" in disaster relief,
rather a facilitator and stimulant for donor action. For
questions on the fund, contact gdinfund@gdin.org
GDIN
Industry Technology Conference Endorsed: The Conference
also endorsed as an official GDIN event, a US Government-sponsored
industry technology Conference scheduled for October, 2000
in Hawaii.
Internet
Domain and the GDIN website: In addition, the conference
also asked that GDIN be given the URL www.gdin.org. This
topic was under discussion as the URL was then used by a national authority.
That entity then agreed to sell the url to GDIN. The Conference endorsed the web site, which is a portal
to GDIN activities and other disaster resources, not a disaster
information repository in its own right, though it will
likly contain useful databases.
GDIN2001:
Australia was endorsed as the host of the GDIN2001 Conference.
Details will be posted on the GDIN website. During the year,
the GDIN Conference Committee (Mexico, Australia, the US
and Turkey, plus some GDIN staff) will explore a venue for
2002. GDIN participants are encouraged to propose venues
and possible hosts and topics of discussion.
Regional
initiatives were launched in Asia-Pacific, the Mediterranean
and Africa led by the European Commission, the United States,
Australia, Nigeria and Kenya. These are studies to see how
a GDIN might be of value in those regions, perhaps through
the development of regional disaster information networks
(RDINs).
Bilateral
and NDIN News:
It was also announced that during the conference the President
of the United States signed an Executive Order establishing
a US GDIN which may be a model for other governments wanting
a national disaster information network (NDIN). GDIN was
originally envisaged as a linkage of national or regional
systems. The Russian and United States delegations also
announced in a press conference joint cooperation on GDIN
and an intent to report joint progress at the Australian
Conference in March 2001. This could be a model for other
bilateral initiatives of values to GDIN.
Information
Facilitator:
The proposed structure and function of an information facilitator
was also discussed in detail and will be the subject of
a Working Group coordinated by Alta Haggarty of ReliefWeb.
The concept was proposed specifically to help disaster managers
get the right information in the right format, even in situations
where the Internet is not an option. It is also designed
to help disaster managers on the ground give "information
providers" a work requirement statement clear enough so
that they can respond in a timely manner with the right
information. The concept is to provide an active human expert
interface and MOU system to augment traditional passive
web structures, though automatic features would also be
possible. While the concept was agreeable to most of the
conference, and there was support for GDIN to facilitate
the flow of information this year in some manner, especially
as a disaster season is about to occur, this specific proposal
will need study in order to fully appreciate resource requirements
and how the MOU system might operate. For example, do the
experts sit in an office or are they on-call volunteers?
What are the obligations under an MOUs system? What parts
of this function might be automated? These factors and how
the idea links to more traditional web structures will be
explored by the working group. This was turned over
to David Baxa in 2006.
Future
Pilot Projects and the Role of Industry: Pilot Projects
from any sector of society, academia, industry, etc, were
seen as an important element of GDIN, but participants made
it clear in off floor remarks that they did not want these
to be blatant attempts by industry to sell products.
While
the end result of a pilot project might expect to benefit
a firm, the project's main goal must be the substantiation
or examination of GDIN standards and procedures. The Industry
and Pilot Project Working Groups both felt this way and
intended to develop internal rules to prevent abuse. For
questions Paul Bourget at DOD was the original chair
person. .
Several
firms displayed their wares in booths at the conference,
and also participated in numerous panels, to include a workshop
dedicated to developing a strategy for engaging industry
in a useful partnership, chaired by David Baxa, who was
commended for his impartiality. This partnership was considered
essential by most participants; though the consensus also
was that work shops and plenary sessions should not be used
for purely commercial purposes. GDIN participants interested
in industry strategy should contact David Baxa at david.baxa@vistait.com.
Preliminary counting indicates forty experts attended from
industry.
NGO's,
Small Communities and Academic Centers also all played major
roles, in particular for illustrating the essential added
value of those sectors of society to the success of a GDIN.
Of special note in these subjects were the leadership roles
provided by Mario Aquilar of Mexico, Dr. Joanna Papoulia,
Center for Marine Research, Athens, Professor Louise Comfort
of University of Pittsburgh, Patricia Jocius of San Mateo,
California, Russell Coile of Pacific Grove, California,
John Owen-Davies of the UK, Professor Tom Austin of Iowa
State, and many others. Preliminary counting indicates that
29 experts attended from academia, three from local and
province level governments, 13 from the NGO community and
4 from the Red Cross. Tom Austin is already planning a GDIN
International Academic Conference in 2000 in order to strengthen
this sector's participation.
Working
Groups:
Existing
Working Groups were confirmed and new ones developed. Each
was given given its own page on the GDIN web site. Each Chairperson
was also asked to develop terms of reference, to provide
a list of participants and to work with the Executive Director
on work requirements over the year.
As
identified at the Ankara Conference, these are the current
working groups. Participants are encouraged to join them.
An additional working group that would examine how GDIN
might be of value in tracking infectious diseases has also
been proposed, but not yet formed.
1.
Academia: Al Austin, Iowa State University
2.
Capacity Building: Mario Aquilar, Embassy of Mexico,
Washignton, DC.
3.
GIS/Remote Sensing: Jean Yeves Bourchardy UNHCR.
4.
Industry: David Baxa, Vista Technologies
5. Information Facilitator Definition: Alta Haggarty, UN
OCHA,
6. NGO's: Patricia Jocius, San Mateo, California and John Owen-Davies,
Reuters, UK.
7.
Pilot Projects: Paul Bourget, US DOD
8.
Policy: Dr. Albert Simard, Natural Resources, Canada
9.
Regional Initiatives Africa: Col B. Wendo, National
Disaster Operations Center, Nairobi, Kenya and Kenneth Nsor
and Olowu Oluremi, National Emergency Management Agency,
Nigeria. Asia-Pacific: Jonathan Abrahams, Emergency
Management, Australia,). Mediterranian
Initiative: Dr. Anver Ghazi, European Commission,,
and Lori Dando and Dr. Fernando Echavarria,
US Department of State
10.
Small Communities: Dr Russell C. Coile, Pacific Grove,
California
11.
Standards: Dennis King, UNICEF,
and Jean Yeves Bouchardy UNHCR
12.
Telecommunications: Hans Zimmermann, UN OCHA, Chairman of
the UN Working Group on Emergency Telecommunications.
13.
Infectious Diseases: Coordinators being chosen. First meeting
will be held in late June.
Commendations:
Dr. Albert Simard of Natural Resources, Canada was commended
on several occasions for coordinating the development of
the Ankara Declaration. Dr. Polat Gulkan and Dr. Hussein
Guler of Turkey were praised on many occasions for managing
the conference, which was considered a significant success.
Vice President of the United States Albert Gore thanked
the gov't of Mexico, Turkey and Australia for making these
gatherings possible. Australia drew much praise for their
efforts to develop an effective Asia-Pacific partnership
in support of GDIN. The major contribution of Larry Roeder,
who worked tirelessly during the past year in developing
the agenda and arrangements, was also widely acknowledged.
Jill Brachhausen of AmTech was commended for her work in
developing the GDIN web site and for her technical advice
during the conference.